Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Creativity is spontaneous action and is usually developed in childhood. Some people believe that children who use Technology a lot are less creative. However, If I had to choose, I would take the previous opinion side for several reasons, and I will develop my opinion in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, Technology makes children think less about getting knowledge. Information is already available on the internet, and children have to look for it on the world wide web without judging or trying to know if this information is correct. This action makes children less creative and less able to use rational thinking. I have to admit that my personal experience has influenced my opinion on this matter. in high school, in the seminar course, I used to get all the information about my research from the internet. This course required a lot of creativity and brainstorming; however, I did not use any of them. And I should admit that I missed the opportunity of learning how to think artistically. You can see that Technology has a negative side and destroy creativity.
Furthermore, addiction to Technology reduces children's ability to communicate with others. Children nowadays are addicted to mobile phones, online applications, and video games. This addiction makes them poor communicators because they live in isolation bubbles with their technology world. Communication skills and the ability to make proper conversation with others are considered one the creative ways to express ourselves. Drawing from my little brother's experience, he is a video game player. He plays for hours daily and barely talks with anyone outside the family.
Consequently, my brother is a terrible communicator. He cannot make conversation and does not like to be in a gathering. He lacks communication skills and the creativity to make heart-to-heart talk. As a result, my brother lost this talent, which I believe is crucial today. It is undoubtedly clear that Technology would destroy children's ability to talk and understand the world surrounding them.
In light of the reasons mentioned above, I firmly believe that Technology has made children less innovative and destroyed their imagination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s influenced my opinion on this matter. in high school, in the seminar course, I u...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...negative side and destroy creativity. Furthermore, addiction to Technology red...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29714285714 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07657376353 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.452919722 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6086956522 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2173913043 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202177556344 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593489607498 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573151053166 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118480492241 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415454816636 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.