Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no shortage of opinion on whether or not the technology has made children more or less creative. In my opinion, I disagree with the author that technology has made children less creative that they were in the past. I feel this way for main two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, technology saves alot of time from avoiding trivial activities and makes children more focused on important matters; eventually making them more produtive and creative. For instance, we can take example of the students in high schools; they no longer require to invest alot of time in calculating the numerical problems and arthematics unlike in past. The use calculator can make tedious tasks easy. Similarly, the invention of computer has make easier to prepare reports to them using ms word, excel and powerpoint. The saved from the use of technology can be invested in the works where the children are interested. Thus, the technology helps to enchance creativity in children.
Similarly, the use of technology has also facilated the children to get required materials and information easily and quickly. For example, the development of internet facility has made the availability of information so easy that the children are one click away to get the information that they require. Unlike in the past, they can easily learn about any information on which they are interested and this has made very easy for children to know about things. The information available in internet is almost free and attainable by almost all children. Eventually, this has lead to the increased creativity among the children. Therfore, technology has actually uplifted the creativity.
In sum, because of the aforementioned reasons, I agree with the statement that the technology has made children more creative than ever.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There is no shortage of opinion on whether or not the technology has made children more o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'investing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: investing
...in high schools; they no longer require to invest alot of time in calculating the numeri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they no longer require to invest alot of time in calculating the numerical proble...
^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...merical problems and arthematics unlike in past. The use calculator can make tedious ta...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, similarly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, first of all, in my opinion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18120805369 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85092739939 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51677852349 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7316755317 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324081677224 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113392840146 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102295994409 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22480244823 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783386017975 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.