Creativity is making original ideas, Discovering new procedure, exploring new methodologies. In other words it can be defined as the creation of any new thing.
According to my view, Technology advancement totally affected the creativity of a child in a bad way. I have two reasons for it which I will explore below.
My first point is "lack of critical thinking and thought process".There were days when children didn't have the internet and they used to think a lot to make a school project in the best way. For example, when I was in class eight,
I participated in a science exhibition organized by my school. Before a weak, I started to prepare for my project.I struggled in many ways to make my idea into reality. I think that the journey of struggle and thinking process helped me a lot later when I joined Ph.D. I believe that thought process and critical thinking plays a vital role to be a successful businessman, scientist or anything. This quality has been disappeared in kids nowadays.
Second reasons I would give the " lack of originality".Technology provides so many opportunities to them, they do not want to use their brain much. In most of the scenario what I
have observed whenever they feel difficulties, each google any put the ideas. You want to make websites powerpoint presentation or application something, you can just google it and you can find thousand of the template. You don't need to use your own original one. Kids, as well as adult, are becoming the slave of the internet. I think it's very important for a student to develop new ideas new process without seeking internet especially for the one who wanted to scientific experiments in their future.
In conclusion, I believe that To be creative, one needs to have the critical thinking, a thought process, and original ideas. These three are the Important parts of success for any field.
Hence I strogly Think that technology has made children less creative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ally affected the creativity of a child in a bad way. I have two reasons for it which I will...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ical thinking and thought process'.There were days when children didnt have the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ess'.There were days when children didnt have the internet and they used to thin...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ak, I started to prepare for my project.I struggled in many ways to make my idea ...
^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Technology
...ve the ' lack of originality'.Technology provides so many opportunities to them,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain much. In most of the scenario what I have observed whenever they feel difficu...
^^^
Line 10, column 195, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...you can just google it and you can find thousand of the template. You dont need to use y...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 225, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... can find thousand of the template. You dont need to use your own original one. Kids...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ortant parts of success for any field. Hence I strogly Think that technology has ma...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... success for any field. Hence I strogly Think that technology has made children ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26738621411 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2592362916 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128524325167 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417588719563 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053918987441 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691221783541 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576388203147 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.