The reading passage and the lecture is both about "Gone with the Wind, a great historical Movie produced by David O Selznick based on Margaret Mitchell's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel. The lecture counters all the points made by reading a passage about the racism in the movie by giving an explanation to those specific points.
Firstly, The reading passage states that about Scarlett O Hara, the main actress, her family went for the American civil war to degrade the black people.. and criticize the movie. On the other hand, in the lecture, Professor explains the doubt created by reading a passage by saying that in movie it has been depicted that it was not good decision for the war.
The second point of criticism was about this movie doesn't provide the first name of Butterfly McQueen who plays the role of house servent(Pissy). However, in the lecture prof illustrates that although her first name was not given in the movie it was seen that her character was very strong and smart and it has been shown in the film that dignified character was loved by people and she got an academic award for this.
Third point, made by reading passage that,
Professor says that this is a very important movie of all time specially in feministic and romantic angles. People should appreciate the movie's best aspects and not criticize the small things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...an civil war to degrade the black people.. and criticize the movie. On the other h...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...civil war to degrade the black people.. and criticize the movie. On the other hand,...
^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...point of criticism was about this movie doesnt provide the first name of Butterfly McQ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 138, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'movies the best'.
Suggestion: movies the best
...ic angles. People should appreciate the movies best aspects and not criticize the small thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88311688312 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43328554515 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5579460257 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206868919708 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861902310093 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978944779025 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123012047282 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110344962002 0.0443174109184 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.