Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television, newspapers, magazines, and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities. Use specific reasons and details to explain your opinion?
It is claimed that media overly pay attention on celebrities and public figures, leaving them no chance on private life. Although TV shows or hardcopy journals have duties in front of public persons, I dare to say that celebrities have a right to have private life. Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether media overuse public figure’s lives as a source of information. Although it might be interesting for general public to read about luxury or famous figures, a writer has to know the limits.
To begin with, in order to become a celebrity, one has to be a talented person in such fields as music, politics or other types of showbiz. To be specific, nowadays a person may become famous by posting short videos or memes on the Instagram, or newly invented Tic Tok. Those “stars” may be born even in the school age, by demonstrating something fresh or new in their lives. This is a kind of pleasure to “take a part” in the life of famous persons by “liking” their memes or being a part of short videos. People usually have no motivation to develop their own account on the social web and mankind usually love reading about other interesting people, fostering their development in social web.
Nonetheless, when a star appears on the radar of media, writers set it as personal aim to uncover all the secrets and open black boxes of their lives. However, by using private data such as meetings with others or personal sensitive information, “creators of breaking news” may break the law. For example, personal data may be used to take loans from micro-financing organisations. Thus, the data may be used not only for “sport” interest.
By the same token, excessive attention may harmfully affect the characters of public persons. To be specific, sensitive data leakage may inculcate celebrities destructive or even aggressive behaviour. For example, when a Russian celebrity Filip Kirkorov has been filmed by a random group of people, he attacked those reporters and broke their cameras. Destructive attention from general public may turn private lives into hell. For example Chester Bennington from Linking Park made a suicide on the basis of depression from excessive attention of media.
All in all, any media organization which uses the personal data of celebrities has to know its own limits, which inculcate the sense of responsibility in general public who read the articles about stars. I firmly believe, that the life is a gift and no-one has a right to disrupt the others personal areas by using the private data in order to boost sales of media. This practice has terrible consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Olesya23 | 83 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Winner_007 | 90 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Winner_007 | 76 | view |
| 2020-08-29 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 77 | view |
| 2015-02-24 | Wafaa | 33 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 90
- Many people dream of owning their own business but are afraid of the risks Instead of starting a new business however one can buy a franchise A franchise is a license issued by a large usually well known company to a small business owner Under the license 81
- Children should spend all their free time after school studying Do you agree 90
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Global issues 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... life. Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether media overuse public figure’s lives as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n. Although it might be interesting for general public to read about luxury or famous figures,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...eir cameras. Destructive attention from general public may turn private lives into hell. For e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nculcate the sense of responsibility in general public who read the articles about stars. I fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, as to, for example, in general, kind of, such as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78489878223 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.170223819 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.619047619 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195905454215 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608844817875 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404792526343 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11299103747 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025950011017 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.