Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
In today's progressive world, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of work in our life. Some people argue that is very important to work quickly and risk making mistakes. On the other extreme of the rope, others hold the opposite opinion. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
To begin with, making mistake you can learn valuable experiences. In other words, mistakes at work is a good way to improve functional and helpful skills for achieve our personal goals. Take my own experience as a example. When I was working at a marketing company, I used to say my individual ideas at my work. Hence, I used to take risks by giving some questionable concepts. After two years, I could correct my mistakes and improve my abilities at work. As a result, I was promoted in my job. If I had not made mistakes in my job, nor could I learn important experience neither could I get a promotion.
Secondly, a good form to relive stress and worries is by making mistakes. To be more specific, people who take risk and make mistakes at work feel more comfortable to express their ideas. Moreover, they increase their self-confidence at job. For instance, an experimental research conducted by some master's psychology professors at university shows that people who have less stress in their job have less mental disease, such as depression. Therefore, making mistakes at work can be good for our lifestyle.
In conclusion, take the above reasons in to account, making mistakes at work not only open up a whole gamut of important concepts and advantages, but also can provide for people a good mental health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rsonal goals. Take my own experience as a example. When I was working at a market...
^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'masters'' or 'master's'?
Suggestion: masters'; master's
...experimental research conducted by some masters psychology professors at university sho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84690553746 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7702888884 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8348701934 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3157894737 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263553674515 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857933660539 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821330830612 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164506242261 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222814119245 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.