Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In progressive today's world, the quality, and quantity of products and services are the two most important factors. However, there is a controversy about the priority of these two elements. While some people hold the opinion that quantity and the amount of products or services is the most important factor. Others stand on the other side of the continuum, believing that the quality and minimizing the mistakes is the most important factor. I, personally, subscribe to the latter group for some reasons which are elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, all people incline to be successful in their carriers that it is not gained but through making the customers satisfied. These days, all people are looking for reliable with minor defects. Therefore, if a given company tends to be successful among all competitors in its occupation, it only should focus on producing high-quality products. These days, individuals access to a wide variety of goods. So, when they find imperfect products associated with many mistakes, they do not buy them again. In this vein, the company loses a potential customer forever. So, by working fast and making mistake not only cannot company progress but also it loses the customers in a long time. For instance, I used to buy my lunch from a given restaurant. In the beginning, the quality of its foods was satisfying but after increasing the customers, they lost the initial quality, and sometimes some part of the food was burned. So, I stopped buying lunch from there.
Second, in some careers such as governmental or medical services, the products or services can be rendered only when they are perfect. Therefore, working fast by making mistake is only wasting time, energy, and material. In these cases, workers should review all steps and repair defects. Therefore, although the quantity increases, at the end of the day they should spend a huge amount of time fixing their mistakes. A personal example can drive this notion home. I am working at a beverage producing factory. Many workers in the factory try to work fast without enough attention to the details. For example, when they want to adhere the labels to the bottles, they just put the label quickly and go to the next bottle. As a result of this, at the end of the workday, we have a noticeable loss.
By and large, with both aforementioned reasons into account, I vehemently assert that quality assurance is the most important element in all jobs even if it takes more time to produce a product or provide a service. The more attention people pay to their work, the more profit they can gain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the beginning, the quality of its foods was satisfying but after increasing the customers, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir work, the more profit they can gain.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93181818182 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63162191135 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9067717057 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4615384615 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146387725155 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385618949508 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438307337117 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911611408166 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206417109146 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.