Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer?
The modern people tend to go with the times. Life became fast but more convenient and advanced than ever. The claim above is debatable but some people would support it and other ones argue against. Personally, I think that the suggestion that is better to do work quickly and do mistakes looks impracticable. I will broach some pros and cons that validate my opinion.
To begin with, most people gain to do more work in less time in order to get income faster and have more time for their families and friends. In increased life span people want to fit in and have more benefits right away. Moreover, some young specialists learn this way, the more mistakes they do, and the better their results will be in the future. This way they build the fundament for the more appropriate experience to pursue a higher position at work and society. The biggest disadvantage of this pace is low quality of work, products or services. Another con of it is an inability to fix their mistakes to get a better result. For example, I am a laboratory technician at the clinic, sometimes in cases of emergency doctors order fast tests. It is the usual test but it should be done as quickly as possible. To put it first on the table I always do them faster than others but I always do the test in the right pace, I just do it at first and other tests are waiting on my table. If I make a mistake it can cause serious issues with the health of the patient, in this particular case, it is highly inappropriate to do your work fast and do mistake. Anyone can see where it leads in the worst case scenario – the death of the patient on the surgical table. That is why I strongly believe that all work should be done slowly with accurately in any field.
From the other hand, no one can argue that there are people who considered as experts, they should make fewer mistakes if none at all. They are the most knowledgeable people in the field and their work is the best. For instance, when the university hires a new professor the administration eager to provide the most prestigious person with honors and a great experience to educate their students at a higher level. The first thing that needs to be said here is that the professor became an expert in his field not in one year it usually takes a long road to achieve this status and excel on his job. Eventually, some mistakes were made at the beginning of his way to success but after some time this particular person is capable of teaching students better than average professor. This process is long and hardship but it definitely brings more benefits if you take it slow and weight every detail of work.
Doubtless, the disadvantages of the claim outweigh the advantages, all aforementioned points presented pretty strong to verify my position. People should do their work in a low pace to avoid mistakes and try to do it scrupulously to achieve the most results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 870, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'slows'?
Suggestion: slows
...ely brings more benefits if you take it slow and weight every detail of work. Do...
^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rupulously to achieve the most results.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2387.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54666666667 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5257200316 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7139592942 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.48 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204161835174 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589045255254 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523520768082 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126817045789 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433366229575 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.