Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
In the modern era, working hard and continues is very important. Progress countries need hard working more than everything else. Some people believe that it is important to work quickly and risk making mistakes but In my viewpoint, working slowly and make sure that everything be correct is more advantages. In follows, I will elaborate my opinion at some reasons.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is economical aspects. When a work starting attention to economical aspects is essential. Entrepreneurs don’t have unlimited money for their works. They don’t accept high risk in their works. When a work start and doing quickly, not only it has a high risk and make mistake but also it may waste the casts and bankrupt its investors. Hence working quickly could distractive a project. My own experience is a complete parable in this case. When I was a collage student I work in a construction project. I was one of the supervisor agents. We had two group of workers who work two times, daily and night. Nighty group working slowly and have a good attention to the project and We don’t have any mistakes, but daily workers working quickly and don’t have exactnes. One day we had a trouble accident and one of the surface that they were concreted collapsed suddenly. This event have bad effect and waste a lot of money in project.
The second reason which is important is saving time. One of the important aspect at all works is the time index. Never don’t imagine quickly work don’t save your time, vice verse it may waste your time if you make only a mistake. Therefore, all work and important projects needs high accurate of performance. For example, a recent report derived from German BMW company depicted that their workers who working slowly have lower flowed in their products, whereas, workers with high speed prodution have negative influance on the product. This report showed that quikly work have goten twice time more than regularly other works. This company publishd more detailed things about its workers, it emphasized that slower worker are patient persons and are success in their personal works too. Therefore quikly work with low pericious could waste time of products.
In short, with aforementioned, altough some people and researcher claims that working quikly is better, in my opinion working slowly with high accuracy is better actually. In one hand, this is a economical method that reduce the cast risks at the other hand, this is a exactnes method that don’t waste time and prevent of duplicated works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing slowly and make sure that everything be correct is more advantages. In follo...
^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to be mentioned is economical aspects. When a work starting attention to economica...
^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e the casts and bankrupt its investors. Hence working quickly could distractive a pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nce is a complete parable in this case. When I was a collage student I work in a co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I work in a construction project. I was one of the supervisor agents. We had two...
^^
Line 3, column 950, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ncreted collapsed suddenly. This event have bad effect and waste a lot of money in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...aspect at all works is the time index. Never don't imagine quickly work don&apo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lower flowed in their products, whereas, workers with high speed prodution have ...
^^
Line 5, column 810, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e success in their personal works too. Therefore quikly work with low pericious could wa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e cast risks at the other hand, this is a exactnes method that don't waste ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in short, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20185614849 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80617026302 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519721577726 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.0770215699 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2307692308 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5769230769 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312898787691 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872047728045 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100679005402 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219454451284 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104780935093 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.