Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Cars have an influential and tremendous impact on our lives. In fact, it is vitally important to own one in order to assist us to reach our educational institutes or workplaces at a short pace. However, I believe that due to the technological development that happens within the contemporary era such as the accelerated urban advancements such us building industry's factories in the rural area that lead to increasing the percentage of pollution, so, in order to reduce the pronounced threat of it, the number of cars will decrease to compensate for that damage, in addition, people with time will seek to improve their communication skills by leaving their cars and use the public transportation.
To begin with, with the spread of human bad activities that lead to affecting our ecosystem dramatically such as the use of many cars that emit smog. Indeed, this substance when it burns, it will emit carbon oxide that is harmful to the survival of a verity of organisms which will cause a vast array of chronic diseases such as cancer. For example, myriad leading causes of death have been distributed due to the smoke and the nuclear diffusion which is due to man-made mance, that reflect negatively on our planet pure air, thus, in the future, people will use to give up their cars to counteract the major cause and effect chain of pollution that might contribute to damaging of our well- being. In conclusion, people must not belied their environment because this will be a plundering of God gift.
Second, modern life requires a developed social skills to gain more profits as these skills are deemed as the essential role in leading the work to stunning annual progress. In fact, by interacting and communicating with diverse people from different spheres, these abilities will improve. For example, many dwellers use to use public transportation rather than their vehicles because this will aid them to save many in considering the cost of gasoline comparing the cheap price of public transportation, moreover, this gives them the opportunity to meet new inhabitants which will, in turn, will help them to learn how to deal effectively, cooperate efficiently and collaborate effectively with the people surrounding them, thus, such a collaborative environment enhances their communication skills immensely which have a positive impacts on their future workflow and productivity. Consequently, in order to have optimal social skills, people should sway to use vehicles that will help them to create new relationships.
To sum up, even the cars have many merits but the drawbacks overweigh the advantages, so, I believe the number of cars will be less in the future
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...modern life requires a developed social skills to gain more profits as these skills ar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ill improve. For example, many dwellers use to use public transportation rather tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10250569476 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94308941633 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542141230068 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 162.672536609 48.9658058833 332% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.666666667 100.406767564 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5833333333 20.6045352989 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 5.45110844103 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163991918852 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645009396561 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388320546087 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107728254313 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121844622104 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 11.7677419355 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 58.1214874552 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.