REmbrandet
The reading excerpt states that there are doubts whether some paintings such as Portrait of Elderly women in a white bonnet that are attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him, the author provides three reasons for support. However, the lecture's audio claims that there are a lot of problems with the author theories and she refutes each of them by stating the cause behind the arguments is not obvious.
First, the article avers that there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed, that she was wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear. In contrast, the professor opposes this point of view by saying that the fur collar analysis showed that it was not a part of the original painting, but, it was added after a time, in order, to increase the value as it showed the form of aristocratic ladies. Therefore, this doubt is wrong and not credited to the what the lecturer discussed.
Second, the passage points that Rembrandt was the master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting, these elements do not fit together. On the other hand, the lecturer argues this theory by stating that the original painting was simple with light color clothes that reflected the illumination to the face, moreover, it was realistic and that what expected from that painter. So, this point of view contradicts what the professor explained.
Third, the excerpt mentions that the examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together while the painter not used the glue in his paintings. In contrary, the speaker contracts this idea and says that this painting enlarged to be more ground and with more value, so that, they used pieces of wood. Moreover, it was made by the same type of wood which is from the same tree as Rembrandt was used. Thus, this theory is definitely wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lectures'' or 'lecture's'?
Suggestion: lectures'; lecture's
...three reasons for support. However, the lectures audio claims that there are a lot of pr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76876876877 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40445857954 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5495787057 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.