Generally, the current young people are very crazy about their personal cars. Some of them are maintaining car as a status symbol. However, the increased pollution and the cost of living restricting people to buy personal vehicles. If the same global warming continue in the future, definitely it impact on the car sales. Personally, I am off the convicted that, in the future, there will be limited use of the personal car than today. I fell this way that for two reasons that I will explain in the following essay.
First, as the technology developing in the automobile industry, it simultaneously enhancing the pollution. People from the past generations are very healthy and active, even though they don't have advanced medical facilities because of the less environmental pollution. Similarly, since the people are educating and realizing the importance of health most of the young people from current generation prefer public transportation to reduce pollution. What more, in the future generation I am pretty sure people limit the use of their cars. For example, recently a university conducted a research on car sales rate since last two years. The result was surprising because the sales rate was gradually decreasing and the scholars predicted that, in the future the sales might be reduce to half as today.
Second, now a day the maintenance of the personal car is expensive because of the huge taxes and increased fuel prices. When I was child, the gas price was cheap and does not had any extra taxes but now the situation is different. The fuel price is four times higher than the past with additional taxes such as road tax and professional tax and insurance and I don’t think so the price will reduce in future. Since the expanses are increasing, the people prefer public transport. For instant, when I was young age there was no public transportation to my village because everyone has their own vehicle, but now every day three services because the public utilizing public services even though they have personal vehicles. this example clearly shows how the people limiting personal vehicle.
In conclusion, the increased pollution and the financial burden to the common man limit the use of the car. I hypothesizing that this will be continue in the future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impacts'?
Suggestion: impacts
...g continue in the future, definitely it impact on the car sales. Personally, I am off ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ry healthy and active, even though they dont have advanced medical facilities becaus...
^^^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...xample, recently a university conducted a research on car sales rate since last two years....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...d, the gas price was cheap and does not had any extra taxes but now the situation i...
^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n't think so the price will reduce in future. Since the expanses are increasing, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ven though they have personal vehicles. this example clearly shows how the people li...
^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w the people limiting personal vehicle. In conclusion, the increased pollution a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...he common man limit the use of the car. I hypothesizing that this will be continu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04736842105 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77001655045 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507894736842 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.979250739 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128862247339 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043393722917 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559967751493 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987561038335 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559416348188 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.