Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
Most of the universities these days advertise themselves as the one having the extra-curricular activities being conducted timely to attract the students while admission. However, if a choice is to be made for funding whether the classes or library or any other sports and social activities, classes and libraries should always be the utmost priority in the university. I believe so based on the following reasons.
Firstly, The primary purpose of the university is to teach the students who are devoured for knowledge. Those students attend the university with the aim to study the majors and pursue their career in respective fields. In addition to this, there are other group of students who are willing to take part in the research activities and discover new and peculiar aspects which aren't visible through normal perspective. Thus, it'd be unfair to such students who are attending the university with the aim of making advancements in their life by learning the subjects and major which they yearned for. By curtailing the funds that should be spent in quality faculty members and classrooms, libraries and research activities and using it in sports and social activities is quite futile task to do.
Secondly, The barometer for the touting the university as successful is primarily by the academic results of the students studying in that university. This will help in increment of good will of the university and act as a tool to lure more students in successive intakes. For instance, If US News published the list of successful universities and ranked them in the order of their academic successes, it is likely that top universities will be inundated with application in the coming intakes. Thus, this might also benefit university economically.
However, while maintaining that academics should be the first preferences, it doesn't necessarily mean that the sports and social activities should be ruled out completely. Sports and social activities certainly help the students to deviate themselves from the hectic and tedious academic environment of the university and provide refreshment. The sports and social activities should be funded too but it'd be unconscionable to fund them in equal amount to that of academic related activities. If a student is highly intrigued to be involved in sports activity and social activities, they might join the sports academy or social organizations filled with likeminded people of theirs.
Hence, while juxtaposing the academic related activities and sports or social activities to prioritize the funding, it would be prudent to fund more on the academic activities as it is the primary and foremost objective of the university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...s. In addition to this, there are other group of students who are willing to take par...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...discover new and peculiar aspects which arent visible through normal perspective. Thu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ics should be the first preferences, it doesnt necessarily mean that the sports and so...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 604, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... social activities, they might join the sports academy or social organizations filled ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28738317757 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96995887751 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478971962617 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4158907731 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.117647059 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235607205057 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856551291208 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529792019684 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141540523071 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478677818755 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.