Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The car has been prominent means of transportation in the modern days. With the advancement in technologies, several sophisticated and facilitated cars are available in the market. People have been using it for several purposes like commuting to work, traveling to an expedition, or jaunts. Hence, it has been an inexorable part of our life. At this instant, if someone mentions that these cars are going to be lesser in the coming future, it will seem like a heretic opinion. Yet, I agree with this.
Firstly, the increased number of cars have been a major problem in traffic management. Thus, to cope with this issue the government of my country has come up with a plan. The public is being encouraged to use local buses and metros which could accommodate a significantly higher number of passengers in a much lesser area. The study suggests that in 360 square meters, cars could accommodate 50 passengers while a bus could accommodate 180 passengers. Moreover, people are also supportive enough for this change. On top of that, the government has been meticulously redesigning the routes and tracks of public transportation like buses and metros to cover the most part of the city. If one could access their destination easily via public transport, they'll likely take the option of public transport as it is cheaper and avoid the painstaking task of driving all the way long.
Secondly, the car runs on non-renewable resources like petroleum fuels and the use of solar-powered cars isn't pervaded as per the expectation. With the growing concerns of the adverse effects of non-renewable resources on the environment, the use of cars is being discouraged. One of the very eminent instances of this issue is of Hummer car of GM Motors, United States. In 2009, people or we could even call them extremist people started a campaign of destroying the Hummer cars. Several Hummer cars on parking lots, garages were destroyed. Consequently, GM Motors put an end to the production of the car variant. This incident which occurred 10 years ago could be a harbinger of similar instances that might occur in the coming future. Several environmentalists have been arguing time and again to reduce the use of cars operating on non-renewable resources and have an impeccable point to argue with.
To conclude, despite the use of the car is prominent in today's time, it might not be surprising if it gradually fades away with time in the coming future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etic opinion. Yet, I agree with this. Firstly, the increased number of cars ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 763, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...estination easily via public transport, theyll likely take the option of public transp...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...fuels and the use of solar-powered cars isnt pervaded as per the expectation. With t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96829268293 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94407621691 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529268292683 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8622866846 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5909090909 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188816926552 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580524288853 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468479437122 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129372250936 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353375644501 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.