Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of doubt, we live in the age of science and technology. The life of everyone of us highly depends on scientific inventions and modern day technologies. Science and technology has changed the lives of people in a great extent. In this regard, there exists a heated controversy among the people as to the impacts of technology especially television sets in the homes. While, some people assert that the TV is a useful device to the children's development, others think otherwise. As far as I am concerned, I subscribe to the latter group for several reasons, among which the negative contents of the most TV programs, dismissing the face to face communications, and create significant medical as well as psychological diseases are of conspicuous ones.
First and foremost, the most people suggest that the modern technologies such as internet-based social networking, text messaging culture, and advent of television sets have provided an outstanding opportunity to humans to find out their lost long friends and connect with their family members from different parts of world, but these inventions have weakened the face to face communications among the humans. For example, the parents spend the great deal of their times on the television films and series so that they have no time to their young adults to solve the problems. Therefore, the society which means the interaction between the citizens and humans, has lost its real meaning.
Second, although it may be asserted that TV educational contents can help the children to learn valuable lessons, it can adversely affect the education of them. It is important to be noted that some TV programs such as geographic channels play a significant role in familiarizing them with wildlife and diverse animals and plants, but due to this fact that children cannot have a dominance on their decisions, exposes them onto the negative contents of TV like the sexual and violent movies. Consequently, children become important victims of these bad contents.
Last but not least, sitting for long time in front of TV programs has negative impacts on the children. With this in mind, according to Newton's third law of motion, "For every action, there is an opposite reaction", which is indicative of the fact that TV can both the positive and the negative influences on the kids. Accordingly, psychologists approve that those of children who sit in front of the TV programs after a small time, their creativity has been affected and they lost their innovation and cannot think and make logical decisions in the necessary conditions. In addition, the long-sitting of kids enfeebles their eyes and create a vital problems in the future.
To sum up, with this all into account, technology is a two-edged sword and can both useful and detriment effects on the people. The using time of TV programs should be managed by their parents because they have no control on their feeling and after a while they addicted to the bad content programs and as e obvious result, their behaviors and educational level are changed in improper ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 649, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...enfeebles their eyes and create a vital problems in the future. To sum up, with this ...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as well as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26512455516 0.229887763892 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.115658362989 0.158761421928 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0978647686833 0.0866891130778 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0355871886121 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0462633451957 0.0685040099705 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135231316726 0.118717715034 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0284697508897 0.0351676179071 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83548745788 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0266903914591 0.0309702414327 86% => OK
Particles: 0.00355871886121 0.00188951952338 188% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.11743772242 0.0887237588012 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142348754448 0.0209618222197 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00711743772242 0.0139019557991 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3096.0 2387.08602151 130% => OK
No of words: 511.0 408.028673835 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05870841487 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363992172211 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295499021526 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205479452055 0.174417080927 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131115459883 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83548745788 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52446183953 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 63.3294168783 59.2087087015 107% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.3888888889 20.5533526081 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.4690984844 48.84282405 195% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.0 120.699889404 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3888888889 20.5533526081 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 57.9387910415 45.7405998639 127% => OK
Elegance: 2.17117117117 1.45489161554 149% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215411297014 0.300154397459 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12413265154 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.067967867911 0.0752933317313 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621278255821 0.497263757937 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13886132181 0.151897553556 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103416691181 0.114077575197 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356596974297 0.0781384742642 46% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41425777495 0.336927656856 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.071062210681 0.067059652881 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160048354974 0.210909579961 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151872001638 0.0618886996521 25% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.