In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Nowadays, the human -resources are inevitable and vital part of any society, since the improvement of the country sharply relates to their discoveries, innovations and lucrative activities. There exists a controversial issue between the people as to whether the government should hire youth people with low experiences or use experts with invasive knowledge. While many people may agree with the argument, there are several aspects that need to be analyzed thoroughly before coming to a solid conclusion.
In today's competitive world, leading a country toward the developments and modifications not only requires to the connoisseurs, high skilled and experienced people, need to mathematicians to correctly scrutinize the outputs of the results and simulations. As an example, in the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), many high skilled professors and researchers intensively work on the renewable energies in producing the large portion of USA. All these programs vehemently need to funds and supports of US. Department of Energy (DOE) to lead the research results to the prosperous situations. In the labs of university, some naive and PhD students have a great insatiable appetite to have a significant contributions in this procedure, which it is not possible without the help and supports of high skilled professors. Moreover, the organizations would not rely to the youth in giving a large amount of funds to them, while the connoisseurs are the best options in this regard. As a result of these programs in IIT university under the management of knowledgeable and expert people, the portion of generating electricity by renewable energies such as wind turbines and solar systems have remarkably increased in compared to the past years. Therefore, high skilled experts thanks to their mathematical and managing characteristics can persuade the officials to the get funds through a scathing and fervid flow of lectures and speeches.
Despite the unequivocal contributions of experts in important developed programs of the countries, the youth are the future of any society so much so that the insufficient consideration to their affair can lead them to the perilous situations and may not have a responsibility as a citizen to the advancement of the country. According to the decisions of stringent laws of the Youth Ministry of Hong Kong, the entire universities who operate in national research programs are obligated to run the programs by youth. One of these areas is pertaining to the computer science. Those young students who are prospective and talented ones in programming and creating the software receive a noticeable amount of funds from the university. As a result of this confidence was resulted in creating one of the important and vital engineering software, namely NeT to the academic communities all over the world. In addition, using and committing young generation in research programs not only intensively makes them hopeful to the future, gives them a golden opportunity to be familiar with the social relations and sharing the ideas between each other. Totally, I would offer a solution to make a balance the devoting the funds between both experts and youth people fairly. In my opinion, we need an independent committee that the members are chosen by the experts. In this committee, the members without any consideration the government's concern should firstly identify the keen projects from low important ones and then gave the important and strategically projects to the experts and less significant ones to the naive and the young but prospective ones.
In conclusion, the countries should use both experts because of their skills and experiences and beginners due to their great avid in achieving the apex of the advances in their projects, but the government should make a difference between them to refrain the possible dangers in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... controversial issue between the people as to whether the government should hire youth people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'fund'.
Suggestion: fund
.... All these programs vehemently need to funds and supports of US. Department of Energ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'contribution'?
Suggestion: contribution
...satiable appetite to have a significant contributions in this procedure, which it is not poss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Those young students who are prospective and talented ones in programming and cre...
^^
Line 5, column 1302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. In my opinion, we need an independent committee that the members are chosen by...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and the young but prospective ones. In conclusion, the countries should use bo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266263237519 0.240241500013 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.104387291982 0.157235817809 66% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10741301059 0.0880659088768 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0347957639939 0.0497285424764 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0226928895613 0.0444667217837 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127080181543 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.036308623298 0.0406280797675 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.09054152052 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0453857791225 0.030933414821 147% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.1482602118 0.0997080785238 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151285930408 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00605143721634 0.0148568991511 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3889.0 2732.02544248 142% => OK
No of words: 615.0 452.878318584 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32357723577 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.58838876751 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.343089430894 0.280924506359 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.256910569106 0.200843997647 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172357723577 0.132149295362 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09054152052 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 219.290929204 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494308943089 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 61.6812942829 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 29.2857142857 23.380412469 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3041491167 59.4972553346 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.19047619 141.124799967 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 23.380412469 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.761904761905 0.674092028746 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 63.5946573751 51.4728631049 124% => OK
Elegance: 2.65420560748 1.64882698954 161% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451207731308 0.391690518653 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122172810868 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0696193236212 0.077325440228 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626412648408 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137683411486 0.149214159877 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223354554539 0.161403998019 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772374555581 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.612764349461 0.385218514788 159% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.125008149736 0.0692045440612 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341102905852 0.275328986314 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745677108331 0.0653680567796 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.