Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Communication is the most important part of society and people feel more energetic and mentally healthy when they talk and spend quality time with each other. The early settlements and communities developed in essence to meet the needs of people. Nowadays human beings have connections with others, for example, students with teachers, coworkers with their boss, mother with her children, and there is a lot to mention. All of these communications can have many cross-advantages for people and improve productivity in daily tasks or in whole life. There is an argument that some people, including me, believe when people communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project and others refute the statement. In this essay, I am going to explain my reasons to support my idea.
First of all, distant communication like e-mail can not convey people's spirit and excitement. When people can see each other in person can understand how much others are excited about the project. Therefore people even can influence their colleagues in a positive way to increase productivity in the company. For example, during the Corona Virus in our company, we had to work remotely and the results of the employees decreased remarkably and managers worked hard to find out what causes low efficiency. Finally, they found working from home decrease the tendency and satisfaction to communicate more about projects and find better solutions. So, in-person meetings and communication played a significant role in companies' success.
Secondly, communication about a topic in person increases social skills and people learn teamwork. Since many things improve within the good behavior patterns, it will increase productivity. The lack of being able to work as a team or making proper relations with others will cause lots of misunderstandings among people. As a result coworkers in a company and classmates in a classroom become more isolated and reluctant to discuss projects. This disconnection between people will reduce their willingness to produce better work.
To sum up, as I mentioned above, making in-person connections with others can take into account basic needs and it shows the significant role of communication in everyone's life and how can it improves the quality of their lives. As a result, they will be more satisfied to produce better work in every aspect of their lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t convey peoples spirit and excitement. When people can see each other in person can...
^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...each other in person can understand how much others are excited about the project. T...
^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...h others are excited about the project. Therefore people even can influence their colleag...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ple even can influence their colleagues in a positive way to increase productivity in the company...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2442159383 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91052981 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573264781491 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0456831828 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.368421053 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353503760921 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101929671099 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106056272506 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212588941789 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696957026131 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.