Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Almost everyone acknowledges the benefits of team works and have come to believe that for many purposes we need to utilize the productive potential of participating in the groups. However, a controversial question is about its effectiveness for school students; whether they learn much more working on their assignments in a group or they get better results to work alone? Personally speaking, It seems more reasonable if they are asked to focus on their work apart from a group as it lessens time working on the projects, benefits them mastering all facets of the assignment, and keeps them away from being manipulated by some negligent students.
First, the group members scatter each others' time and energy. In one hand, they initially distribute the responsibilities as everyone bring some piece of the information which aids them to conserve time. On the other hand, the group should take its time to share the ideas and information and convince others about why's, how's, what's, etc. Admittedly, it does not weigh more than working alone which you do not need to put such energy and time for delivering what you worked on and try to make them perceive your points of view.
Second, some students do not eager to take any burden on their shoulders and evade from working as hard as you do. Indeed, they use the teamwork to cover up their irresponsibility as finally, the whole group will compromise their negligence and makeup for them to get an excellent mark. In the end, they get justified evenly, and the inattentive person of the group will win his/her manipulative purposes. Although, if they were asked to submit their assignments by their own they would not have the chance to take advantage of other students.
Third, sometimes the groups do not devote enough time to share their idea thoroughly, and the members who have issues understanding some piece of the concepts may be left behind. Allegedly, the sense of group working halts them to push themselves harder to comprehend what they do not. Nevertheless, those students would have studied harder comparatively, to find the best way of solving that puzzle if they were asked to work on their own.
All in all, I must admit that working alone by default will lead one to focus ampler while the time from baffling in a group and serves that preserved time to work on the sections which are challenging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... First, the group members scatter each others time and energy. In one hand, they init...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: why's
...d information and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: how's
...rmation and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does not we...
^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...n and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does not weigh mor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90074441687 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70866831481 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528535980149 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5795567429 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238234558424 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855443508777 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694146422174 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138605698929 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367132116372 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.