Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the role of teaching approaches that teachers use in their classes on the learning efficiency of the students. In this regard, one controversial question is whether it is better for the students to work their assigns in a group or to do alone. Despite the arguments asserting that students learn more efficiently when they do projects alone, I believe otherwise, maintaining that working in groups enables students to learn better. To support this, there are myriads of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated through the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that working in a group provides a great opportunity for the children to learn from each other when they have a problem in understanding a specific subject. For example, when I was a student, our chemic teacher asked us to work on a project in a group. We started working on the subject that the teacher had given us. During working I found out that I understood the teacher's lecture wrongly. So, my friends explained the subject to me that caused me to understood the lesson better. Had not I worked the project in the group, I would not have understood the class's lesson appropriately.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that working in a group leads to the learning process becomes more attractive and efficient for students. Because studying alone is so monotonous for students in most cases. According to the results of a study that have been done at the University of Tehran, students who work in a group get 15 percent more in their final exams' score. It should be noted that studying in a group not only can elevate students learning quality but also it helps them to become more successful in their future job.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons to account, one can conclude that studying in a group helps students to learn better and gets help from their friends. In addition, this approach enhances the attractiveness of studying for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Coal ash 76
- Human presence on Venus 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ing in groups enables students to learn better. To support this, there are myriads of ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ying in a group helps students to learn better and gets help from their friends. In ad...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, in addition, in most cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84033613445 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75577583727 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6251230313 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307574036202 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108965749942 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918947351315 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181992712892 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930848102197 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.