Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the role of the different device's advent such as cell phones on the children's education quality. In this regard, one controversial question is whether educating children is a more difficult task today or in the past. Despite the arguments asserting that using cell phones or social network cause children's learning process difficult, I believe otherwise, maintaining that these devices help teachers and parents to educate children efficiently. To support this, there are myriads of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated through the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that there are devices available today that improve the children's learning process. Despite the fact that using cell phones, tablets, and other devices could waste children's time, on the other hand, these devices can be used in children's education process. A study has been done in the University of Tehran about the effect of cell phones on the final scores of students. They evaluated two groups of students. The students in the first group had cell phones or tablets but the second group's students did not have these devices. According to the study's results unexpectedly the students who had cell phones gained more scores in their final exams compared to students who did not use cell phones.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that always spending more time in education does not lead to better results. In some cases, quality is more important than quantity. Nowadays educating quality is better than the past that causes children learn different subjects efficiently. For instance, when I was a student, our teachers gave a lot of assignments for us to do at home. Those assignments were monotonous and they did not add further knowledge to us. Had our teacher gave students fewer assignments with higher quality, students would have learned more things with less effort.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons to account, one can conclude that nowadays educating children is easier than the past because children can benefit from different devices that elevate learning efficiency. In addition, today, education quality is better in comparison to the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...w of doubt on the role of the different devices advent such as cell phones on the child...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...day that improve the childrens learning process. Despite the fact that using cell phone...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, such as, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18817204301 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64828471942 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540322580645 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1587250334 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27928548925 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863490572102 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494589454075 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169264587436 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419379885221 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.