Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must wok together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I absolutely agree with that statement, and I believe that when students must work together on their assignment, they learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. I hold this view because of several reasons. First, working together on assignment in groups help students learn more efficiently than working alone, because they have more chance and opportunities to exchange ideas and information while they work together. Second, working in groups enables students to strengthen their friendship-bond and communication, which might lead to positive impacts on their quality of results.
According to my point of view, working together in particular groups to do an assignment or projects enables students to exchange their opinion and information to improve their works. In other words, team-working projects probably results in better outcomes than working alone on projects, because one's who prefer to work alone, is not able to detect his weakness and defects, while, individuals in groups help each other to ameliorate their blemish in order to enhance their quality of projects. Besides, working alone is based on a single idea, and person who works alone is deprived of various opinions and views of other ones, since, group members have the chance to gather different ideas and choose the best one.
Moreover, to me, working together motivate students to have better communication. To illustrate, students, who decide to work together, have a great opportunity to fortify their friendship relations, which influence directly on their results of projects. For instance, when I was 16, my Physics teacher assigned a project on all the students in our class, and he divided all students to several groups, and each group with a different subject. As far as I can remember, our group was consists of 5 person. We did our best to present a strong project to receive a good score, but what was important to us, was our friendship, because we had a sincere friendship that I never found such a friends after that.
Generally, I do agree with that students should work together during school for doing their assignment, and it is more effectively than working alone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...n remember, our group was consists of 5 person. We did our best to present a strong pr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...cere friendship that I never found such a friends after that. Generally, I do agree with...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is more effectively than working alone.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, for instance, in particular, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15363128492 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79079357173 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4649884142 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.923076923 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341418351663 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135960613724 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133621060734 0.0737576698707 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237822514541 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956895368733 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.