Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to supp | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to supp

A controversial issue relating to whether students are more effective working projects together or alone has been brought to the attention of the schools as well as parents. Relevant teachers are urged that it is better for pupils to work along with other classmates, which is more productive than studying alone. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable because of some reasons as below.
To begin with, it is easier to create innovative ideas when pupils are studying collectively. To be more specific, every one has his own standpoint which is totally different from others about the same project because he holds various comprehension of this problem. If students accomplish the project jointly, they would not only explain their views but also listen to a number of thoughts from group members. With those diverse ideas above, people would left the best parts and form a creative result eventually. By researching with other schoolfellows, students could finish the task well and obtain achievements in the end. On the contrary, doing the project alone is pretty hard for someone who may have less knowledge or thought about this assignment. Using all the efforts, individuals may not get grades as good as studying cooperatively. Therefore, completing the mission along with schoolmates is beneficial for pupils to gain outstanding results.
In addition, accomplishing projects with team members could save a lot of time and increase productivity. When people communicate with each other face to face, they could understand other individuals' views more directly and quickly so that the project would proceed well. Hence, students either do not need spend much time on the research or acquire excellent scores. Moreover, if somebody within the team has difficulties that he could not figure out by himself, other members could provide him with numerous solutions Therefore, everyone could finish their tasks more rapidly as well as fruitful. For instance, once the professor assigned a task to survey the population of community. Our group made the division of the community, everyone went to the designated area. Finally, we completed the survey in a pretty short time and obtained a prominent grade. From what was discussed above, working jointly would save much time and improve efficiency.
Finally, one could barely fully concentrate on their project when he is studying alone since they are too many things that could distract them. Students could be attracted by mobile phones, music or news when they are doing their project independently, thus they have little chance to fulfill the mission well.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, doing the project along with fellows is much effective for students since it could generate many advanced points through exchange ideas with others and save much time. After all, time is life.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'leave'
Suggestion: leave
...those diverse ideas above, people would left the best parts and form a creative resu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to spend'?
Suggestion: to spend
...ell. Hence, students either do not need spend much time on the research or acquire ex...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, after all, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2181425486 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67551075216 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544276457883 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0808855723 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.043478261 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1304347826 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13043478261 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29685103412 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784543007293 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611523734577 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183695289165 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498916709952 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments