summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the points that several reasons to explain why it is impossible for human to maintain a permanent presence on Venus mentioned in the reading passage
In the reading passage, the auther discusses that it is impossible for human to maintain a permanent presence on Venus since the conditions are extreme and inhospitable, while the lecture claims that what the passage state is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
Firstly, according to the reading passage, it is suggested that atmospheric pressure on Venus's surface is 90 times greater than the pressure at Earth's surface so that almost anything humans might land on Venus would be crushed. In contrast, the professor argues in the lecture that high up in the atmosphere, the pressure would be much lower than at the surface. To be more specific, 50 kilometers up in the atmosphere, the apressure is equal to the normal Earth's face. In this case, there would be nothing be crushed.
In addition, the statement in the reading material indicates that there are no reservoiers of water and enough oxygen on Venus and it is impractical to supply of water and oxygen from Earth. On the contrary, the professor points out that Venus contain some components such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. Both these chemical materials could use to make water and oxygen. Therefore, people do not need to worry about lack of water and oxygen.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that little sunlight can get through the clouds and the clouds can blocks even more light, thus humans could not get electricity to power their machines and equipment since very little light reaches the surface. However, the speaker argues that clounds above 50 kilometers are thin, so there would be some sunlight filter through. Moreover, the cloud could reflect sunlight, hence the cells could collect the direct light and the reflect ones. There will be enough electricity generated to power the station.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ells could collect the direct light and the reflect ones. There will be enough electricity...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03618421053 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50454702489 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536184210526 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3418393132 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174461479806 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053298621312 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627616791839 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109446124064 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833050970944 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.