Providing Internet access is as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
A controversial issue relating to whether the government should provide Internet access with both citizens with no cost since Internet access is just as important as other services has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged that governments should not charge no fee of the web to residents. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, if the administration supply Internet access to every person with no money, which signifies that they would not have enough funds to support other services of the country. To be more specific, the comprehensive development of the contemporary society including a number of aspects, such as building railways, expanding markets, improving citizens' salaries. In this case, if governments put plenty of money into the construction of the Internet access and offer to each individual for free, they would not be able to possess extra funds to construct other facilities of the community. As a result, this policy would not benefit to the progress of the whole nation and the residents may not live in a better environment. On the contrary, if the leader of the state could distribute some money to the sides related to the people's lives rather than only improving Internet access with no expenditure, the families would feel a sense of happiness than before.
In addition, providing Internet access without charge would cause a lot of severe issues in the society. The students would spend lots of time on computers instead of studying hard since the web is free of charge. After a long period of time, grades of youngsters would be down quickly. Numerous adults may also take a long time to surf on the net and even use it wrong. For example, they may find some contents related to crime, drugs and sex on the Internet. They may equally play some attractive online game all the day. Under these circumstances, they would not devote much time to work or company with family members. Moreover, this behavior would also damage their mental and physical health. Therefore, the administration should not open to the Internet access to the public for free.
Finally, individuals should use the web reasonable if the government offer them without any charge. All the efforts of the country are to make the residents' live more comfortable and convenient. Hence, the public should use the Internet more effective and and do not waste the leader's endeavors.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, the nation should not supply the citizens Internet at no cost since they may not have enough capacity to support other services of the city and both the young teenagers or adults may addict to the web completely.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the web is free of charge. After a long period of time, grades of youngsters would be down qui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
...time to surf on the net and even use it wrong. For example, they may find some conten...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... should use the Internet more effective and and do not waste the leaders endeavors. To...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95444685466 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6711180014 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507592190889 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5996490115 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.761904762 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365166183937 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942136114684 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101969573459 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207062569938 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865689249146 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the web is free of charge. After a long period of time, grades of youngsters would be down qui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
...time to surf on the net and even use it wrong. For example, they may find some conten...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... should use the Internet more effective and and do not waste the leaders endeavors. To...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95444685466 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6711180014 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507592190889 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5996490115 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.761904762 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365166183937 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942136114684 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101969573459 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207062569938 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865689249146 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.