Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

A controversial issue relating to whether the information on the Internet offers the public is valuable or creates problems has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged that a number of precious messages from the Internet could provide people with assistance. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, plenty of cherished information on the Internet could bring convenience to every aspect of citizens' lives. To be more specific, students nowadays could use the Internet to search for some solutions related to discipline difficulties that could not completely be handled by themselves. As a result, they could easily figure out those issues through the web instead of taking time to ask others. Moreover, many graduates could find recruitment information of their desired companies and have an interview with leaders online directly. In this case, they would not have to go to the office for a face-to-face interview if they had some urgent things in universities. Therefore, applicants could acquire acceptance notifications successfully by getting the messages from the net. Lastly, people could also obtain numerous significant policies of the country, which would have a huge impact on their lives. Hence, getting timely information on domestic reform would be beneficial to individuals' development.
What is more, citizens could have a deep understanding of the whole world by receiving rare messages on the Internet. Some family members may not have the chance to travel to another country but they are still curious about foreign cultures and customs. Under these circumstances, they could use computers to watch documentaries and literature relating to freshness and even communicate with foreigners through the cameras. Therefore, people could broaden their horizons through those treasured viewdata they obtain on the network. In addition, at present, the development of global economy, science and technology is integrated. People should grasp this opportunity to gain more valuable data from other nations and have more innovation ideas so that the country would own a better prospect in the future.
Finally, people should gain some positive information on the Internet rather than harmful messages that could have an unsound influence on individuals' physical and mental development. For example, some information about violence, drugs, crime is unwholesome for the public. From what was discussed above, it is important to properly filter content on the web.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, the web certainly provides the mass with a great deal of rare messages which would play a vital role in people's study, work as well as life. It also gives residents an approach to fully feel diverse cultures.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38513513514 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85425236338 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7808071421 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.681818182 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215131785762 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612738528659 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495581214698 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135096872138 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543648818876 0.0645574589148 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.