Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no shortage of opinions on, internet provides valuable information or make it more confusing. In my opinion, I believe that internet provides a lot of valuable information, which is very much useful in our day to day life. I think this way mainly for two reasons. Which I explain in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in order to get valuable information we should trust on an authentic websites. Which provides us an exact required information in lesser time; this will eventually eliminates confusion. For example, Google is one of the most trusted search all over the world. If we want to search regarding current weather forecast, then google is so efficient that it will bring most authentic and trusted sites up on the list. We can easily read and understands information regarding weather. These trusted sites are developed by professionals and information is updated by researchers. So we can blindly trust these sites and get fulfilled our requirements. For this reason, I think internet provides a lot of information.
Secondly, internet provides information in depth with research so that, there is no window for doubt or confusion regarding confusion. For instance, websites like Wikipedia. On Wikipedia people adds their research findings; these findings are firstly evaluated by many other researchers. Moreover, if we want to learn new skills like programming, soft skills, cooking. It will be available in fraction of seconds; these is the power of internet. This is certainly clear to see that how information is available in detailed with proper manner through internet.
In conclusion, there is little bit chance of confusion for newbies if they are not aware of accessing internet but, if we they know once how to access proper website there is no chance of confusion in people. Considering above two reasons, I agree with view that internet provides people a lot of valuable information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... think this way mainly for two reasons. Which I explain in the following paragraphs. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'website'?
Suggestion: website
...rmation we should trust on an authentic websites. Which provides us an exact required in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'eliminate'
Suggestion: eliminate
...on in lesser time; this will eventually eliminates confusion. For example, Google is one o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...gh internet. In conclusion, there is little bit chance of confusion for newbies if they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17891373802 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94671241323 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536741214058 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0198700648 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.05 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282166726724 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842284660765 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079528841358 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174423860346 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276375668837 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.