Plastic bags are terrible for the environment They should be banned everywhere

Essay topics:

Plastic bags are terrible for the environment. They should be banned everywhere.

Plastic materials have as many advantages as disadvantages. As plastic is not decomposable material it is harmful to the environment. I agree with the statement above that, plastic bags are terrible for the environment. They should be banned from everywhere with supporting that following are three reasons.
Firstly, plastic is artificial material and it is not easy to decompose plastic. For example, plastic toy produced many years ago still exists in dump yard because they are of no use anymore and can not be decomposed. Additionally, an environmental report from 2019 tells that, once the plastic is created it transforms from one form to another form they never get destroyed.
Secondly, plastic bags are the main reason for recent climate changes in the world. For example, The flood situation happened in Mumbai in 2010, which is caused by canals blocked by these used plastic bags. These bags blocked the flow of water which result in a flood disaster in Mumbai. Moreover, burning plastic can cause environmental pollution as they emit harmful substances on burning which causes air pollution.
Finally, plastic bags are harmful to animals. For example, If a plastic bag containing food is thrown and any animal like a dog or cow eats that plastic bag with food. The animal might get injured. Moreover, a recent report from the health ministry states that, if we eat hot food kept in plastic bags that will cause cancer.
In conclusion, considering the above disadvantages of using plastic I agree with a statement made above that plastic bags made from plastic should be banned everywhere as they are terrible and harmful to the environment.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...rmful for the environment. I am totally agree on statement above that, plasitic bags ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70952189811 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2707134912 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.875 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450470988144 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149685834145 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101156897465 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276907525955 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103817032961 0.0645574589148 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.