better from those at their own level- such as fellow
There is no shortage of opinions on people learning things better at their own level or from a higher level. In my opinion, I believe that people learn better from those at their own levels like friends from the same age group or coworkers. I think this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First of all, people at the same own level like fellow students or friends or colleagues know better about our weaknesses and strengths hence they can guide us through a better path in order to learn things. As we spend most of the time of our life with our coworkers, and friends of similar work groups so we get to know each other as well as their strengths and weaknesses. My personal experience is a compelling example of this, during our college final year project I was working on a complex project like google maps in which I was facing an issue regarding the application of one of the data analytics algorithms and I was depressed because my project got stuck due to this issue. I discussed this issue with my fellow student who is also my good friend. He quickly find out the mistake I was doing in that application as he knows my weakness in the integration topic. He pointed out my mistake in less time and efficiency which result in the progress of the final year project. This example clearly illustrates how we learn from our own level.
Secondly, people at our own level go through the same surroundings and similar circumstances so, they can help us to find the solution to any problem we are stuck into. Drawing from my own experience, during the initial days of my first job as a software engineer, I was shy and afraid of addressing in front of many people. One of my colleagues found out that I was getting scared while talking in front of many people. He suggested that he was also going through the same situation a few days back but when he starts talking random strangers on the streets or hostel. That developed confidence in him and asked me to do the same. For some days I followed that trick and surprisingly that trick worked for me. After two months of practice, I was able to address people more confidently and boldly. It's clear to see from the above example how we can learn better from other people at the same level.
In conclusion, people at a higher level do have a more experience than us however, considering the above two reasons I agree with the statement that people learn things better from those at their own level than from the higher-level people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...my opinion, I believe that people learn better from those at their own levels like fri...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 773, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... who is also my good friend. He quickly find out the mistake I was doing in that app...
^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
... and similar circumstances so, they can help us to find the solution to any problem we are stuc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 857, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...from the above example how we can learn better from other people at the same level. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54166666667 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5156625023 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47149122807 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4477558983 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329971412785 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113426361636 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149929051684 0.0737576698707 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275351680384 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136752109136 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.