summarize the points in the passage, being sure to explain the discovery of the dinosaur described in the reading passage
In the reading passage, the auther discusses that some scientists might find remains of the actual tissues of Tyrannosaurus rex, a dinosaur, by deliberately broke open the T . rex's leg bone. While the lecture claims that what the passage state is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
Firstly, according to the reading passage, it is suggested that breaking of the fossilized leg bone revealed many small branching channels, in which had a soft, flexible prganic substance that might well represent the remains of the actual blood vessels. In contrast, the professor argues in the lecture that it is not true. After a long time, bacteria might colonize the hollows inside of the bones. Hence, it is highly possible that the soft substance in the branching channels of the bone is the traces and moist residue of the bacteria rather than blood vessels of the dinosaur.
In addition, the statement in the reading materials indicates that spheres could explain the remains the red blood cells because spheres not only contained iron that was vital to the role of red blood cells in transporting oxygen to tissues but also had dark red centers. On the contrary, the lecture refutes this theory by pointing out that equal sustance are also found in the same place of the fossils of other primitive animals that had no red blood cells when alive, which proves that the hyphthesis in the reading is indenfensible.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that the dinosaur leg bone should contain collagen, a main component of living bone tissue. The professor refutes this claim by giving evidence that no collagen could last longer than 100,00 years. Given that this dinosaur fossil is 70 million years old, the collagen discovered in the fossil should come from a recent source, which, could be the skin of the researchers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nosaur, by deliberately broke open the T . rexs leg bone. While the lecture claims...
^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Rexs
...aur, by deliberately broke open the T . rexs leg bone. While the lecture claims that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, so, well, while, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98402555911 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50933588886 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543130990415 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3223396541 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142748827053 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440758406131 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438465335995 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824844467934 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466998826978 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.