summarize the points in the passage, being sure to explain how they challenge the genetically modified trees described in the reading passage
In the reading passage, the author claims that planting genetically modified trees on a large scale could bring a number of benefits. While the lecture states that what the passage discuss is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
Firstly, according to the reading passage, it is suggested that genetically modified trees are more likely to survive in some conditions such as the district has ringspot problem than their unmodofied counterparts. In contrast, the professor argues in the lecture that it is not true. Genetically modified trees are not diverse as unmodified trees and are desidned to overcome some environment challenges, which means that if they are exposed to unfamiliar challenges, they will all die.
In addition, the statement in the reading material indicates that genetically modified trees have a number of advantages including grow faster, give greater yield of food and be hardier, which allow tree farmers to get a big profit. On the contrary, the professor points out that there is a great deal of charge about the seeds for the farmers to undertake that is far more than ordinary trees. Also, when the trees are grown up, farmers cannot collect the seeds and plant them. By law, farmers need to pay for the company every time they plant.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees because they are designed for fast growth and high yield in given geographic conditions would staisfy the demand for firewood or building timber in many of those areas and save the endangered wild tress. However, the speaker argues that genetically modified trees will cause even more damage to wild trees. Among those unmodifies trees, genetically modified trees will complete natural resources with them such as water, soil, sunlight and nutrients.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20394736842 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63059192016 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4319604104 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29092687682 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980598588022 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541653941267 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176550888904 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282085094272 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.