Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People often may debate this argument. It is not easy to agree or disagree with the following statement without considering good reasons for the choice. Many people may state that pupils would concentrate more if they work alone. While others may claim that group projects are effective for students. In my opinion, students can learn more by working with other students. My decision is based on the following reasons.
To begin with, students can get an enormous amount of knowledge by working with their peers. To explain broadly, in group projects, pupils can share their ideas and discuss their thoughts with each other. In this way, they can learn much more effectively. However, if students work alone on projects, they would not able to share their knowledge and get new ideas from others. A typical example in my case when I was in school. My teacher assigned one project to us in the group. Meanwhile, we finished our task within a given time frame and that topic was our strongest topic for the exam. This would not have possible if our group had not discussed the topic and worked deeply on that. Afterward, we performed very well on our exam. If we had not worked on the group project on that topic, we would not have passed our exam with flying colors. This example clearly illustrates the importance of working in a group.
Furthermore, students can learn skills like social interaction. To elaborate on this, pupils can learn how to work collaboratively. Additionally, they learn how to interact with each other by working with other students on assignments. Nevertheless, if students do not participate in group tasks, they would not develop these skills. Take my experience as compelling evidence to explain this phenomenon. My niece was a very shy person when she entered the 1st grade. On the contrary, she became the most talkative child in our family also, she became a very polite person. This was because she had done many assignments with her friends. As a result, she learned a lot from them. If she had not participated in group tasks, she would not have learned how to communicate well. This explanation vividly illustrates the beneficial aspects of working together on projects.
In conclusion, students can learn proficiently by working with their peers on assignments because they can acquire a sea of knowledge and learn social communication. Therefore, I recommend considering these reasons before making any choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0195599022 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72803229407 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488997555012 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6516239602 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.4333333333 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6333333333 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303649494156 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082105333497 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061170680179 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194355647861 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305918546365 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.