Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that working in a group for school's project has many benefits. In my opinion, one of the most important advanages is that students who work together learn much more effectively than those who work alone on projects. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, team work makes the project full of creative ideas due to skills variability. For instance, one student is good in technical writing, another one is a computer specialist, and so on. For example, when I was workong on my graduation project, I had a unique idea, but it needed a special computer system to do it , which I had zero information about it. In response, my friend Sara was a computer expert. at our project, I worked on the idea and the documentation, and Sara did the technology part. At the end, we passed with high grade, so applying for the university projects' competition is our next step.
Second, lectures, teaching from books, and exams are ways to provide knowledge. However, with high amount of information it will not be easy for students to memorize all of them. Therefor, projects are application for that science or knowledge, but if students do not work as a team, they will not be able to make sure that they fully understand what the teacher illustrates. My brother Rami is a biology student. For his midterm exam, his professor asked students to work on a project, but team working was optional. Rami chose to do it alone. a small misunderstanding led to a huge mistake on the project subject, which made his teacher very upset. he told him that if he worked with other students, they could help him in knowing what exactly their project was about.
In conclusion, I stongely think that when teachers assign projects on which students must work togethe, students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects not only because they will have many good skills in one project, but also they can overcome many mistakes by advising each other. Moreover, I suggest that it will be good if they were assigned with people they do not know, so additional benefit can be added, which is making new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eeded a special computer system to do it , which I had zero information about it. ...
^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
..., my friend Sara was a computer expert. at our project, I worked on the idea and t...
^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...as optional. Rami chose to do it alone. a small misunderstanding led to a huge mi...
^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ect, which made his teacher very upset. he told him that if he worked with other s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69791666667 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64285682377 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4465463832 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9473684211 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434032043492 0.236089414692 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119525925056 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106443055444 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281514265646 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906635355759 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.