Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Humankind gets meaningful in society. All of us are tasting different communities since we had born. When people grow up depend on their characters, education, place of living, friends, etc. participate in different groups. Nowadays, there is a different point of view among the people, and some believe that young guys do not spend sufficient time to improve their communities while others are on the other side. I agree with the former group, and I feel this way for a couple of reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, nowadays young people have more concerns and are really busy than ever. Young people of the present generation have different duties and even more responsibilities. With the development of technology and in the modern era, young people face new problems and challenges that they had never before. Today, most of the young people go to universities, and in order to get graduated, they should pass different courses and do lots of projects. It's not an exaggeration if we say that the young people in the present decade are spending one-third of their lives in universities for education.
Secondly, young people are experiencing more difficult circumstances than before in financial issues and also finding a job. When the young girls or boys get graduated from universities, they are not free and even it’s a new start of their major problems. After graduation finding a suitable job that is in harmony with the interests and expectations of guys is important and challenging. Therefore young people try hard to get employed in a company or elsewhere, and most of them spend approximately half of their life for their career.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that in modern life, people have less time to participate in communities. This is because modern life involves new concerns and necessities to people and force the guys to be so selfish. If societies are interested in bringing back their members to different communities in use from their abilities, the politicians should change the principal policies of their people and make enough time for them to encourage them for participation. The more free time, the more contribution to different associations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d gets meaningful in society. All of us are tasting different communities since we had born...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Participate
...ucation, place of living, friends, etc. participate in different groups. Nowadays, there is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ferent courses and do lots of projects. Its not an exaggeration if we say that the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s of guys is important and challenging. Therefore young people try hard to get employed i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, while, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09863013699 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9512025595 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52602739726 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.805994811 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9473684211 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281287616186 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767650411713 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476145819888 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167144478759 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320321575082 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.