Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Adulthood is the best time and they are the wealth for their respective societies. Any society, country is not able to go forward until the young of that society and country take the role. So, social change and development the role of rising population is indelible. According to the given prompt, 'the younger are now not do good for their society' someone would agree, others would have another position. In my view, young people is an integral part of our society’s positive change for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that, in this technologically developed world young generation can easily promotes and helps to bring social justice. In our society, discrimination in everywhere as society driven by the power, money and politics. So, the least privileged people who have not enough money, power often gets injustice. For example, a few days ago while I was scrolling my Facebook page, suddenly I found a video regarding a child rape. In this video, the child was actually lived in a asylum, she has no place to go. One day, the political powerful leader raped her. While raping a school going student clicked the video by his mobile and uploaded online and then went viral. As a result, the video came to notice by the law organization and they proceed the case. And they red herring these culprits and finally incarcerated them. As you can see that, the valiant young efforts made the exemplary instance to get the justice and contribute the social change.
Another reason is that young people doing many works for the sake of their communities during natural disasters. On this vulnerable time, the government effort not make everything, so, they adult come forward to work as a stronghold. To be more specific, when Bangladesh suffered the cyclone 'Sidor' in 2008, many coastal areas were over flooded and most of the people lost their belonging. On that time, we were forming a social group in online to collect funds. After three months, we were able to collect 3000 US dollar and we went the devastated areas to help them. This experience taught me that, young people efforts often make a huge difference during society vulnerable periods.
In sum, it is probable some would argue the above mentioned efforts of young people but in long run such debate will not convincing. Young are not only helps to bring justice for vulnerable but also they helps to rejuvenate our communities. So, we should appreciate our young for their contributions and sacrifices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... video, the child was actually lived in a asylum, she has no place to go. One day...
^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'convince'
Suggestion: convince
...le but in long run such debate will not convincing. Young are not only helps to bring just...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ng justice for vulnerable but also they helps to rejuvenate our communities. So, we s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, if, regarding, so, then, while, as to, for example, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92890995261 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58752581885 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4700259564 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174853478629 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045666102269 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504408415733 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108393982339 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316532944163 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.