Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.
Letting an individual to vote is a great responsibility and should be considered seriously and not in joke. One vote decides who is going to rule for next consecutives years and has a potential of changing a city or a country in a dramatic way. Children might not hold that form of responsibility needed for contributing to such decision. So, I disagree with the given claim that children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.
First reason being, children of this very age are just out of their high school and will not have a broader perspective of the reason election is conducted and how their vote can make a change. sometimes, it is possible that their parent might try to brain wash them into voting for their party of choice. Entitling each individual with a vote means considering their own well though judgement, and not their parent's or somebody elder. For an hypothetical example, if I support BJP and convince my 15 year old nephew, who has no knowledge of the merits and demerits of each party, to vote for that party, then it will be considered as an abuse of his vote. This will be similar to entitling me with two votes, which is wrong.
Next, 15 year old child will rarely hold that kind of responsibility which is required for a voter. He might consider it as a play or gamble and randomly vote a party for fun. It might also be possible that they don't even consider to vote because of lack of overall experience. Corrupt parties can misuse such unused votes in their favour in order to win.
Thus, to prevent such abuse of votes, it is advantageous to not let children above 15 to vote. With voting comes great responsibility. Hence, it must be considered seriously and only the experienced adults should be allowed to vote.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a dramatic way" with adverb for "dramatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tential of changing a city or a country in a dramatic way. Children might not hold that form of r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sometimes
...d and how their vote can make a change. sometimes, it is possible that their parent might...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ot their parents or somebody elder. For an hypothetical example, if I support BJP ...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'child' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'children'.
Suggestion: children
...s, which is wrong. Next, 15 year old child will rarely hold that kind of responsib...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...un. It might also be possible that they dont even consider to vote because of lack o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider voting'.
Suggestion: consider voting
...ht also be possible that they dont even consider to vote because of lack of overall experience. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59365079365 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67366805753 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4840128668 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4375 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287130898187 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113223931942 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125745797205 0.0737576698707 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211360456637 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099235872244 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.