Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. Indisputably, they are mature enough to take their own decisions but not that mature to vote. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion that children over the age of 15 allowed to vote for the following two reasons.
Firstly, children over 15 years of age are not mature enough to take important decisions. They need someone to assist them with their decisions. Sometimes they regret the decision taken by them and tend to change. For instance, a student that has recently passed secondary school takes a decision to pursue in the field of science but later after some months or after passing out from high school tends to change his/her decision. The voting decision cannot be changed once taken.
Secondly, children can be manipulated easily by their peers as they are as innocuous. As voting is right of every citizen and each vote count can decide a win or loss of any candidate. The children can be easy prey for these candidates. These children can vote any candidate if given anything they want or like. For example, a child who wants a bicycle but his/her parents a not purchasing it for him/her. If these elections candidate provides them with this bicycle, then manipulate the child to vote for them.
In conclusion, although children are smart enough to take their own decision but are not mature enough to vote. I believe that the age group above 18 is germane for voting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... decisions but not that mature to vote. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'voting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: voting
...hat children over the age of 15 allowed to vote for the following two reasons. Firs...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o vote for the following two reasons. Firstly, children over 15 years of age a...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecision cannot be changed once taken. Secondly, children can be manipulated ea...
^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elections'' or 'election's'?
Suggestion: elections'; election's
...not purchasing it for him/her. If these elections candidate provides them with this bicyc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nipulate the child to vote for them. In conclusion, although children are sma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 259.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79150579151 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49105075222 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53667953668 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6846222678 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5625 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391915605626 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141210879662 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170191829866 0.0737576698707 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258225193565 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192737699667 0.0645574589148 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.