Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.

There is no shadow of a doubt that education has played a substantial role in developing of country and it is highly recommended that the government should pay much more attention to the progress of students. The issue of whether the government should allocate money to the education of very young children or universities has been one of the most controversial questions recently. As far as I am concerned, the government should allocate its budget to the universities. In what follows, my elaborated reasons will indicate my standpoints.

The first exquisite point to be mention is that the budget of government should be expended on the universities due to the fact that the students of universities are much more knowledgeable than children and they spend most of their time to work on the new discoveries and advancements in a realm of science, so if the government allocate lots of money on these academic projects, student will able to gain some considerable achievements that it will bring about a success of science ??? in the academic environment. While very young children are still ill-equipped and not expertise enough to carry out professional research in any field of study and achieve a breakthrough. For instance, there should be some allocated budgets for the medical student when they are doing some research on ailments and diseases which are incurable. Because, not only it can be so beneficial for the academic environment and address lots of problems, but also for the community and society as well.

The second equally important issue which comes to my mind is that the investment of education on universities is much more beneficial than young students because it brings immediate advantageous and positive results. Moreover, university students are well- educated and investing money in them can lead to results much faster. On the contrarily, when it comes to young children, it takes lots of time to utilities the possible potential of students and not until the age of adolescence that they are able to go to the university and take a job, they are consumers and do not have significant outcomes for the community and government. As a result, society can take the best advantage of adult students and count on them when it is in crisis and difficult situations because they are far more reliable than young children.

All in all, I am of the opinion that investing money in universities is highly recommended rather than the children between five to ten years old. This is because they are more knowledgeable and there is no need to take lots of time to gain achievements.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ll bring about a success of science ??? in the academic environment. While very yo...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'result'.
Suggestion: result
...and investing money in them can lead to results much faster. On the contrarily, when i...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, well, while, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99310344828 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99324053324 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462068965517 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.264742768 48.9658058833 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.8 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267207938355 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825402053714 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050970100795 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158455245677 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131241210835 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.