Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without the shadow of doubt, security at the job has always played a prevailing role in or life. As some people may think in the past people had more secured positions others may think vise versa. As far as I am concerned, now a days individuals are more confident at their jobs. In the following I will delve in to most conspicuous reasons that persuaded me to put forward this claim.
First and foremost, we now have more knowledge of the companies that might be prosperous in the future, because of the data that can be found online, so at the same time we know which ones might face a broke situation. Working in a company with a stable growth rate can assure us since the companies that face a crisis might decrease their number of employees. An instance of this is what has happend where I used to work. I live in Iran and the economy here is not stable and as a result most of the companies in Iran are now closed. I used to work In governmental institute as a clerck but when the situation got worse at first my payment was delayed and in the end I got fired. Now I am working in a company which produce android application but before joining them, I recognized that this company in experiencing a huge growth rate and as a result my position here is safe.
Another point that can account this significant is in the past if you were mentally tired or ill, It was more likely that your boss replace you with a more active labor but now according to the emplyee's right, bosses care for their personel. For example, in our company one of my cleague was a woman and she got pragnent, if it was old times, my boss would have replaced her with another person and she would have lost her job. But instead he gave her a nine month off with salary and by the end of the july she will be back at her old job.
The last but not the least reason is the work labor should be more trained and costs more to prepare a person to do a job because fulfilling the requirments of a job needs a profassional. As a result companies prefer to attain a person that they have prepared before instead of employing a new person. For example, where my father used to work had a one year period and people used to work there as trainies so before eliminating a person they invest a uge amount of time to get him/her back on the course againg.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples advocates the fact because now a days the employee's right is more clear and the technology can give us a vision of might have happened in the future, jobs are more secure than before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ys played a prevailing role in or life. As some people may think in the past peopl...
^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...k vise versa. As far as I am concerned, now a days individuals are more confident at their...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...line, so at the same time we know which ones might face a broke situation. Working i...
^^^^
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uirments of a job needs a profassional. As a result companies prefer to attain a p...
^^
Line 13, column 452, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...before eliminating a person they invest a uge amount of time to get him/her back ...
^
Line 17, column 83, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...and examples advocates the fact because now a days the employees right is more clear and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 87, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...examples advocates the fact because now a days the employees right is more clear and t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32371134021 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41836949206 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482474226804 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1522275993 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.352941176 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5294117647 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124813289553 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389608591352 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365434168765 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719586142743 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036764575729 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.