Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, cars have been the most convenient vehicle for traveling. In Western countries, most families own at least one car, not to mention many millionaires who own different brands of cars. However, this type of transportation dismisses a great amount of fume exhaust, which results in contamination. Therefore, in the upcoming twenty years, the number of cars will fall.
First of all, many governments are imposing heavy taxation on cars in order to cut down on this good. The more the population grows, the higher the demand for cars is. Cars are reported to be the main cause of pollution in major cities such as New York or Bejing. Thus, to minimize the amount of carbon dioxide emitted to the air, a new law on cars has been introduced so as to limit car usage.
Secondly, in the future, public transportation will be improved to meet the need of the growing population. In developing countries, a great amount of money is spending on public transportation each year. For example, the subway in Japan is famous for not only punctual but also affordable. Buses in Korea are very popular with civics because of its comfort. As the public means of transport are becoming modernized, people will definitely drift from driving cars to travel by buses or the underground.
Finally, cycling is another alternative for workers to travel to work. These days, more and more campaigns are launched to encourage biking. It is much cheaper to buy a bicycle than a car. Furthermore, users can save a large budget as petroleum or monthly maintenance is no longer needed. Ultimately, frequent cycling brings us good health. Concerning these reasons, biking is more advantageous compared to driving.
In conclusion, although it seems that cars will bloom in the near future, the contrasting scenario will happen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., a new law on cars has been introduced so as to limit car usage. Secondly, in the fu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0365448505 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84535930592 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63122923588 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9951437773 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.05 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128083308208 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366686649618 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354620583859 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700160957605 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022263319936 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.