Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The issue of whether there will be fewer cars in twenty years compare with today aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that the number of cars decrease in near future, while others have negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I postulate, not only the number of cars increase, but also new kinds of automobiles would came to market. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is that nowadays the population growth rate has drastically escalated and scientists predicted this trend would continue in the future. This population needs an enormous means of transportation for their daily commuting. Since public transportation could not meet this increasing needs, people should depend on their private vehicles.as a result, a number of automobiles escalate significantly. For instance, in my hometown the number of cars increase in recent years and create many difficulties like traffic congestion and air pollution, although government wanted to solve this problem by enhancing the tax of private car and increase the price of the car, because they could not stop the growth of population, these rules could not accomplish any useful consequences. Therefore, the increasing rate of population is the prominent factors to boost the use of cars.
In approaching this issue apart from the reason given above, another reason that deserves some words is that in today’s world people’s income has been increased, it accompanies with reducing the price of the cars encourages more people to have their own one. In contrast, the past that cars were the luxurious possessions and the owing car was a symbol of prestige, everyone can afford to purchase their own cars. Consequently, as time goes, and with improving economic condition in many countries in the future, people would able to obtain even new model car every time they want. For instance, in my country, every member of the family has a car, while my grandfather said they had wish to see a car up closed.
by the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion there will be more car in use in the future because the increasing demand for more care is the inevitable consequence of the growth of population. Moreover, private car considers a splendid property and people would want a new kind of car.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...but also new kinds of automobiles would came to market. In the following paragraph, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s escalate significantly. For instance, in my hometown the number of cars increa...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...they had wish to see a car up closed. by the way of conclusion, based on the arg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, in contrast, kind of, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04316546763 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85028510158 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537170263789 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1689933999 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.2 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19566333791 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659587227665 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530439940203 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126674167385 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611965098276 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.