TPO2 Q1
The article discussing the fascinating topic pertaining to the advantages of teamwork on the fulfillment of a project and provides three reasons of support, however, the professor explains that this idea cannot be true in most of the time and opposes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading passage discusses that a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills that a group possesses can assist a company to get a better outcome than when any single to do the work. In contrast, the professor provides information that in teamwork exists some members that they are a free rider but when projects accomplish, although, they were less benefit but received the same salary to the people who were inside a problem and current issues and completely play the key role in the advancement of the project. Clearly, the disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibiting by the professor.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that one of the benefits of group working is that people as a group can make a risky decision with a creative solution that an individual might not. However, the classroom discussing contends opposite this opinion. According to the professor, in order, a group reach an agreement on an issue they have to hold up any meeting. Sometimes good suggestion may be drop due to the other’s pressure. In many cases, teamwork in this field won’t be successful. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in reading unsubstantiated.
Finally, the reading posts that member of a group can gain many rewarding in teamwork. The professor refutes this point by explaining that when there is something wrong in work process because of low responsibility of some workers the company does not be able to distinguish this problem creates from who and when their project failed all group is blamed while this is not fair.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... claim made in reading unsubstantiated. Finally, the reading posts that member o...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roup is blamed while this is not fair.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, may, second, so, while, in contrast, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04166666667 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8267104839 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.0474662121 49.2860985944 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.