Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The way that humans live is extremely influenced by the technological developments. Since the advent of cars, our lives have been changed in many terms. Despite this fact, using cars has always been a controversial issue. I personally believe that the number of cars in use would increase in future decades, as a result of better financial status of people and decrease in production costs which I explain as follow.
Firstly, economic development of the countries provide such a financial condition for people that allows them to afford more cars. As times goes by, the financial situation of the majority of people, both in well-developed and developing countries, enhances and more people could afford buying new cars. many statistics demonstrate that there is a positive correlation between improving in wealth indicators of a society and the number of cars in use in that society. I strongly believe that this trend will continue, and as a result, more new automobiles will be consumed.
In addition to that, we should consider the technological improvements and new inventions in the industry too; Simply, because these have an enormous impact on the car production industry. In recent years, many new materials and manufacturing methods were introduced which has been employed to build new cars in a much cheaper way. In many production sites, using such method lead to increasing both quantity and quality of the cars. Thus, we could see that the availability of advanced cars has been raised in almost any country nowadays. By considering the rapid growth in almost every science and technological subject, we could surely say that the cost of production of new cars will be reduced in the following years, and this obviously means that more of them will be used by humans.
All in all, more availability and affordability of cars in following decades, next to wealthier future people lead us to consume more automobiles. I hope, besides that, we see improvement in environmental issues associated with the cars as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ase in production costs which I explain as follow. Firstly, economic development of the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to buy'.
Suggestion: to buy
..., enhances and more people could afford buying new cars. many statistics demonstrate t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...re people could afford buying new cars. many statistics demonstrate that there is a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o build new cars in a much cheaper way. In many production sites, using such metho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, so, thus, well, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94518208621 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534534534535 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0864142147 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133033190059 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465599612703 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409820650687 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853252677727 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173884007455 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.