Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recent years have witnessed rapid development of our society, especially in technology. It seemed more and more cars are needed for transportation in order to make our daily work function well. Lately, whether the increasing trend of private cars will be stopped is under heated discussion. Personally speaking, i agree with the statement that there will be fewer cars in twenty years for the following reasons.
First of all, more people will prefer public transportation to private cars for higher working efficiency. Nowadays, it is often heard that white collars are bothered with working trouble, partly caused by traffic jam. Just take myself for example. I work in the center business district in our capital city and there are countless cars traveling across this area everyday. Once I was about to be late for work and took a taxi with the purpose of saving some time. Unfortunately, my taxi could not move when approaching my working place because of traffic jam. It turned out that I spent more than twice as much time as before to go to work and that I lost part of my salaries due to the delay. Since then, I never go to work on private cars out of my own choice. And I believe workers in that district suffer from the same problem with me and will make the same decision as mine.
Secondly, more money has been being allocated to build a better transmit system by the authorities in order to alleviate the environment problems. With the bloom of finance, agriculture, manufacture and other industries, quantities of waste was emitted to our environment. Sometimes, the condition of atmosphere is so bad that we can not even see objects which is only five meters away due to heavy hazard. And it was reported that some local fish die out because factories on the bank directly pollute the waste in the water without any process. Therefore, government together with its citizens is making effort to cut down pollutant as much as possible. Actions such as providing better underground and propose people to take public transportation instead of cars are taken with the purpose of emitting less toxic or greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.
Last but not least, I believe there will be other form of transportation to replace cars in the following twenty years. As is known to all, gases derived from a special kind of stones has been discovered to be a new kind of resources for planes. It is greener and has been put into practice. It is predicted that this magical gas will be put use in CARs later and that a new form of transportation which may not be named as cars will substitute cars. What's more, airplane or underground may be put more attention to because of heavy pressure of on-ground transportation nowadays.
Therefore, I believe less cars will be used in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...heated discussion. Personally speaking, i agree with the statement that there wil...
^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...untless cars traveling across this area everyday. Once I was about to be late for work a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... be named as cars will substitute cars. Whats more, airplane or underground may be pu...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 22, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ion nowadays. Therefore, I believe less cars will be used in the future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7277619322 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525879917184 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5572777361 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.24 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.32 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217162064791 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628275870127 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860302037924 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14838659484 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737875386496 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.