Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recent years have witnessed rapid development of our society, especially in technology. It seems more and more cars are needed for transportation in order to make our daily work function well. Lately, whether the increasing trend of private cars will be stopped or even turned around is under heated discussion. Personally speaking, I agree with the statement that there will be fewer cars in twenty years for the following reasons.
First of all, more people will prefer public transportation to private cars for higher working efficiency. It is reported that white-collars in New York City spend extra half an hour per day on average to transport to work because of traffic congestion. Such commute will certainly exhaust workers and thus reduce working efficiency. Just take myself for example. My office is located in the center business district in our capital city, where there are countless cars traveling across everyday. Once, I was about to be late for work and decided to take a taxi instead of underground. Unfortunately, my taxi could not move when approaching the destination because of traffic jam. It turned out that I spent more than twice as much time as before going to work. What’s more, I was dizzy the whole day, which made me lose focus on my assignments and lost part of salaries. Since then, I never go to work on private cars out of my own choice. Since workers in that district suffer from the same problem with me, I believe they will make the same decision as mine.
Secondly, more money has been being allocated to build a better transmit system by the authorities for better social welfare. Staggering improvement in public transportation has taken place not only within a city but also in inter-city level. Swifter undergrounds, light rails, underpasses and overpasses are constructed for travel convenience inside a certain area. More reliable car-pool system, magnetically - levitated trains and well-equipped airports are ready for inter-province transmit. Citizens are provided with safer and more punctual methods of transportation. Therefore, the number of people relying on cars will decrease gradually. High-speed railway in China is a perfect example to the point. Since it was put into practice in 2010, its passengers has doubled and people depending on cars has shrunk correspondingly according to China Statistic Bureau. Interviewees indicate they prefer high-speed railway to cars for its safety and punctuality.
Last but not the least, I believe there will be other forms of transportation, which exploits renewable resources, taking place of cars in the near future. Based on a recent report from NASA, over half of the glaciers in Arctic has melted due to emission of green-house gases, which further leads to three centimeters rise of sea level. And cars all around the world are chief culprit to blame. In addition, exhaust fume contains other noxious gases including nitrite oxide and sulfides, which damages ozone sphere and may cause further chain reactions across the whole ecosystem. Gradually, citizens on earth realized that concerted effort should be made to tackle environment problem. Scientists have been working overtime to invent other transmit methods, which are driven by solar, wind or nuclear energy. Besides, countless ordinary people exert themselves to cut down carbon emission as much as possible. As a result, fewer cars are predicted to be used in the following twenty years.
Taking all the reasons above including working efficiency, transportation development and environment into consideration, I strongly support the claim that there will be fewer cars in use in the following twenty years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ere are countless cars traveling across everyday. Once, I was about to be late for work ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3095.0 1977.66487455 156% => OK
No of words: 588.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26360544218 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9242980521 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88596722894 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 333.0 212.727598566 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 960.3 618.680645161 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9601760366 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7878787879 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213416617914 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538933440324 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885881318708 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14787033454 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08343995633 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 86.8835125448 195% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.