Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the acceleration of working pace, critical decisions of the society seem to be made more and more rapidly nowadays. Recently, whether we should rely on veterans' versatile experience or tyro's brand-new ideas is under heated discussion. Personally speaking, I strongly support the latter one, i.e. green hand to make vital decision for the following reasons.
First of all, children are playing an increasingly important role in every family, which further influence the whole society. In contemporary age, each household are not as willing as before to have more than one kid since they are faced with heavy financial burden living in urban cities. Thus parents tend to pay more attention to their only child than ever before. What's more, the young are easier to adapt to revolutionary ideas and further impart to their family after their own digestion. As a result, preference of a teenager are likely to affect choice of a family, and then influence the whole society through chain reactions. My brother, Tim is a perfect example to the point. He encountered computers at primary school and developed interest in software programming. However, only very limited family owned a computer at that time, in other word, the early 90s. After a deep conversation with his parents, Tim finally persuaded them to buy a computer and to let him join coding camp. Such incident looks like trivial but thousands of them may accumulate and push the whole society into a digital era.
Secondly, workers in blooming industries are mostly very young and those industries account for over sixty percent of the whole economics nowadays. As is reported in New York Times, the average age of coders in Google is below thirty-five years old, which is quite astounding. Since android system, online applications consist a vital part of every ordinary people's lives, every decision of those young people are possible to shape the way we view the world. For example, before the launch of the first generation of Apple computer, citizens then could never imagine computers will be so convenient to use and will be ubiquitous around the world. However, it is the choice of a juvenile adult, Steve Jobs at his 20s, that alternated the life style of the human race.
Last but not the least, young people are more likely to come up with new ideas, which are more suitable for current society. In the past few decades, countless activities raised by adolescents became a hit and changed the values of people, aging from ten to over ninety. For example, a world-famous propagation named He for She, raised by Emma Watson called for more understanding for able female. Such actions promote sex equalization and benefit not only women but also men around the world.
In sum up, taking all the reasons above, including importance of child's choices, advance of new industries and fresh revolutions, into consideration, I strongly hold that young people are the one who determines the future of man-kind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...n to their only child than ever before. Whats more, the young are easier to adapt to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06072874494 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65412638993 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607287449393 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5549502877 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.695652174 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4782608696 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154597881325 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374849895824 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392473234385 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842536636492 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344224257621 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.