Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.

There have been several disputed discussion on whether it is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects or specialize in one subject. As for everything, there are always two sides to every question. Personally, I believe that one should be specialize in one specific subject. I feel this for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.

To begin with, the first reason is that specialization in one subject helps in the increase of productivity as well as efficiency; moreover, it makes our mind more analytical as compare to a broad knowledge of many subjects. My personal experience is a compelling example of this; about 10 years ago, due to my good marks and high approached towards physics, I decided to major in Btech general. Nonetheless, I found in said major that there was a little glimpse of physics and it included only broad knowledge of subjects like chemistry, math, analytical science etc. These subjects decreased my productivity as well as efficiency. Thus, I decided to change to my major in physics only. As I grew up, I got placed in ISRO, scientific research department of Indian Government, where my work was to do research in physics methods; thus, specialization in one subjects increases the chances of your success in the future.

Besides, the second reason is that specialisation in one subject helps in to achieve success in the future; furthermore, It also helps in to open the consultancy business. for better understanding, let us take the example of my brother, About 5 years ago, he enrolled in Chartered Secretary exams, he has an interest in Indirect business. As he cleared the exams, he opened his own consultancy Company where he gave consultancy related to tax planning related to good and service tax; moreover, his recent balance sheet showed that he gained double networth as compare to his networth in initial stage of business; therefore, specialization in one subject increases the chances of achievement of your own goals.

In conclusion, although there are some scenarios where broad knowledge of many subjects weighted more than specialization in one subject, howbeit, these scenarios are very rare; as a result, I believe that specialization in one subject is better than broad knowledge of many subjects because it increases the chances of success in the future as well as increase your efficiency level.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'specialized'?
Suggestion: specialized
...ersonally, I believe that one should be specialize in one specific subject. I feel this fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ps in to open the consultancy business. for better understanding, let us take the e...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as to, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11195928753 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0169083261 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488549618321 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.185586717 48.9658058833 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.5 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 5.45110844103 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388786855647 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134300200351 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144841909409 0.0737576698707 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265790456271 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135207947411 0.0645574589148 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.