Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teacher to be both popular (like by student) and effective in helping student in learning
It is generally accepted that some teachers are famous in every school because of their approaches. The teachers’ approaches play a vital role in every school. Some people believe that being popular and having an appropriate function in supporting a student to do their tasks is very difficult; nevertheless, other people do not think so. However, it is challenging for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. As a matter of fact, there are some numerous reasons why not only do teachers are, but also they have a great effect on student's productivity.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point out is that if some teachers had been famed in their classes, the performance of their students will improve easily due to the fact that the teachers able to creating an apt ground for having a good communication with their students. For instance, when I was studied at high school, my math teacher was well-known among a host number of students. In the same way, when I was at the math class, I liked listening to class with the great amount of focus while my teacher was teaching because not only did I want to improve my score but also I tended to profound in some important topics at the class. Hence, although I do not have a great function in other classes, the skill of my math had been progressed because of the interest of my math teacher.
Second, the most persuasive point is that liking teachers will have some benefits for students like paying attention enough to what their teacher is talking about that will help to the process of learning children. In other words, it helps the teachers to have a kindly relationship with their students that have a straight connection with developing the productivity of students. To illustrate this point one needs only refer to some popular teachers in the class where a large number of students like to take part in all of their class because of their teacher. Besides, the teachers devote the whole of their time to supporting students without feeling any exhaustion; therefore, by helping the teacher, the ability of students will be better.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that one of the easy tasks for each teacher, who is famous among student, is effective in the approach of their student; therefore, having a lovely teacher lead to increasing reasonable student's function through having a great communication and paying attention adequately to their lesson.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 586, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e, but also they have a great effect on students productivity. In the beginning, the f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ome popular teachers in the class where a large number of students like to take part in all of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ability of students will be better. From what has been discussed above, we m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, talking about, as a matter of fact, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8785046729 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71874283114 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485981308411 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8721359031 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.142857143 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 20.6045352989 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0714285714 5.45110844103 240% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301424088228 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120014609482 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670465086389 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203107546908 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689810316753 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.