Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Governments take great efforts to improve people’s standard of living and attach great importance to the developments of country. They also have to decide how to allocate fiscal expenditure properly. Many argue that money from governments should be better invested in building Internet instead of public transportation. In my view, spending money to guarantee of greater access to Internet outweighs improving public transport system.
Firstly, one of the reasons why Internet access is of more importance is that it is the most critical link for us to the globe in today’s world. What that means is that countries around the globe, in this information-exploding era, are tightly connected, while only the Internet can provide opportunities to help us communicate with the world rapidly and efficiently. For example, through the Internet, people now are able to do oversea business rather than being limited to domestic market. By doing so, the commerce in different countries is highly connected and the import and export of a nation can thus be significantly boosted. This is impossible in the past. Therefore, investment in developing Internet access is much more needed.
Another reason for the Internet's significance is that it holds the key to people's quality of life. This is because with the Internet, we can contact with our families or friends living far from us anytime and anywhere despite the great distance between us; we can conveniently watch a movie or listen to fantastic music online; we can also access to loads of distance learning courses for our self-development. Otherwise, our life will be boring, and we cannot live such a colorful life as today. Internet access is so important that the government are bound to spend money on it.
Admittedly, improving existing public transportation can greatly reduce people’s commute time and distance. Besides, it can help the transport to be more environmental-friendly if a developed public transportation system is built. Despite this, public transportation is good enough in many cities, and developing transportation further has a low price-performance ratio. As a result, if the government spent a large amount of money on this, the effect might not be apparent and this would contribute to a waste of source.
This essay discussed that spending money to improve Internet access can contribute to the closer connection between countries and the people’s well-being. To sum up, strengthening internetwork is more necessary and significant than public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43609022556 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35585135333 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551378446115 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.763656394 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.45 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302084410946 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962072423948 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692273498161 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17965711192 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536330858646 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.