Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It’s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Give specific examples and details to support your answers.
Human has always been instinctively curious about the world he lives in from the beginning of creation and this concept has to lead him to ask a various list of related questions even when answering to many of them is not easy. One of the most noticeable ones of this questions was about the neighbors of our lovely planet, Earth. Therefore, the human started a comprehensive research in this field chronologically. He wanted to discover as much as possible about the other planets atmosphere, existence of life, geography, and every single component that helped him in finding a more complete realization. This passion has always been with the human even till now. In our modern age when the sciences, specifically astronomy, are developing continuously, the governments spend great amounts of money for space travel or space explorations whereas some people believe it’s a monetary waste in spite of the group which finds it necessary because of future probable occurrence. According to which I anticipate about future, space financial investment is the way to go and I will try to explain my reasons to which I think are the most important ones in continue.
During recent years, an intensive worry of the human has always been various aspects of the future generation. Within all these aspects, the future population is the main matter of discussing. The divinations illustrate the truth that in near future, the human would not be able to continue living on this planet as a result of the shortage in the settlement. At this point, he should know all the information required for transferring to another planet. Through which vehicle, this journey starts to become possible? Where is the destination? Are all the vital needs of human accessible there or not… Responding to all these is not possible except with previous research via space exploring. On the other word, space exploration is a so much promising step into future human survival.
Another possibility that should always be considered is space incidents which can threaten human existence. Meteoric impact, alien attack, Earth atmosphere changes, and many other similar concepts are no longer a fresh word to people nowadays. Providing an exhaustive data about them needs a long time energetic accompany of space scholars to finally prevention from the unknown abrupt space-related problems becomes possible.
So according to reasons I defined earlier, I think space exploration is not only crucial for human beings but also essential for frequent presence of them. Accordingly, governments should assign an appropriate amount of budget for space exploring research to not only help present individuals but also to survive future generations. As a strategy for convincing that opposed group of people, these governments should enhance human-related knowledge by extending scientific announcements like Tv shows, posters, books or lectures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...has to lead him to ask a various list of related questions even when answering to...
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
...asy. One of the most noticeable ones of this questions was about the neighbors of ou...
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'comprehensive research'.
Suggestion: comprehensive research
...et, Earth. Therefore, the human started a comprehensive research in this field chronologically. He wante...
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...ver as much as possible about the other planets atmosphere, existence of life, geograph...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, whereas, as to, i think, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31749460043 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93588610972 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574514038877 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4989224609 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.238095238 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150090070978 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411576261059 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542265309856 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095717420429 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267143806245 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.