Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
It has always been the humanity’s dream to observe the space. Since long ago, so many people have looked up in the sky and wondered about it. That is the reason why along with the advances in technology, most of the developed countries have decided to invest their budget in space-related programs. Though some can wonder if this is just a childish chase of dream and a waste, I believe that these researches significantly affect our lives.
Traveling in space involves numerous aspects, comprising a vast research area. To make space traveling at all possible, new frontiers of science had to be discovered. In many cases, these discoveries caused many improvements. For example, telecommunication is a necessary part of any space travel. Whether there is a passenger or not, the spaceship needs to be able to be controlled from earth. Most of the telecommunication means used commercially today, like mobile phones, are a result of researches conducted for space programs in the past. In addition, there have been many innovations too. For example, the first practical outcomes of these researches were the technology of satellites, which play an important role in long distance communications. Satellites also are state of the art, in terms of coverage area. So although these effects may not be obvious to the community, they cannot be denied.
Our planet is always threatened by natural disasters. For instance, in the past few years, giant hurricane formations were determined, before they actually hit. As a result, people had sufficient time to become prepared, and even in some cases evacuate the area. As such, a catastrophic loss of thousands of lives was prevented. As another example, Imagine an asteroid was heading towards earth. With state of the art technology, its course and collision time and place could be measured months in advance, Which is enough time for scientists and engineers to build a and launch a device diversifying its course. Therefore, we may not be extinct by an asteroid hit, as Dinosaur did 65000 years ago. Thus, the technology available today can help save so many lives.
In conclusion, by taking account the above, I strongly believe that the funding of space traveling or exploration programs is necessary. Because of the way it is affecting the advancement of science, that affects our lives directly. More importantly, because tools available today can help us prevent or anticipate disaster before they take place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 330, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ss of thousands of lives was prevented. As another example, Imagine an asteroid wa...
^^
Line 6, column 402, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...steroid was heading towards earth. With state of the art technology, its course and collision ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ipate disaster before they take place.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17661691542 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.004976154 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592039800995 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1895508808 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.24 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.08 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128479660434 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358019120745 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526662219028 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751314644686 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329067633077 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.